Sunday, April 28, 2013

Consumer Reports examines cancer screenings - Boston Globe

Client Reports recently shone a on oversold cancer tests which may confuse as opposed to date=june 2011. The report evaluates 11 cancer screenings, discovering that seven should really be avoided. Screening tests for cervical, colon, and breast cancers are the most reliable tests available, in accordance with Consumer Reportsa first reviews of cancer-screening tests. But most people shouldnat waste their time on tests for bladder, lung, common, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, skin, and testicular cancers. The scores are based primarily on evidence-based evaluations from the UNITED STATES Preventive Services Task Force, an unbiased class supported by the Department of Human and Health Services. Research suggests that even physicians donat always agree on which tests are necessary. When Consumer Reports sought info on the proportions of individuals who're tested for colon cancer, it found striking variations among medical teams. In Massachusetts, for example, where you will find 150 medical groups, the best group rate for colon-cancer screening was 47 percent as the best was just about double that amount, 95 percent. Get these tests Customer Reports suggests three screenings. The features below represent a short synopsis of the contents of the survey. The screening for cervical cancer gets Consumer Reportsa best score, and is preferred for women age 21-65. The screening should be skipped by women under 21, a Pap smear, since the cancer is rare before then and the tests are not correct for this generation. The screening for cancer of the colon gets Consumer Reportsa top rating for people ages 50-75. Testing, but, is less important for folks 76-85. A cancerous colon screening gets a score for people 86 and older and the cheapest score for people 49 and younger. Younger people must look into testing only when they're at high-risk because cancer of the colon is rare before age 50. The screening for breast cancer gets Consumer Reportsa second-highest rating for women 50-74. But feamales in their 40s or these 75 and older should consult with their physicians to see whether benefits outweigh the harm based on their risk facets. Avoid these screenings Client Reports featured seven cancer screenings that people at minimal risk should avoid, such as the following three screenings which received Consumer Reportsa lowest status. The screening for ovarian cancer gets Consumer Reportsa lowest score for women of all ages, because the screening tests aren't very effective. Women donat must be tried until they are at high-risk. There are two tests: a transvaginal ultrasound or even a blood test that measures a protein possibly associated with ovarian cancer. The screening for pancreatic cancer gets Consumer Reportsa lowest ranking for people of most ages. The test is needed by people donat (genetic tests or imaging tests of the stomach) until they're at high-risk, because no test probably will detect the illness at a curable stage. The screening for testicular cancer gets Consumer Reportsa lowest score for men of all ages. Most guys donat need the screening, a physical exam, until they are at high-risk, because most cancers identified without screening are treatable. Questions you should ask Client Reports recommends that people ask their medical practioners a series of questions before undergoing any cancer screening, including the following: If the test answers are good, will it save my life? Am I at greater risk for cancer compared to the average person, and in that case, why? How often does it give wrongly encouraging effects? Are any tests just as good? And, if the results are good, whatas next?

Via: External beam radiation for prostate cancer

No comments:

Post a Comment